Thursday, July 30, 2009

The Importance of Fellow Travelers

Fellow travelers are often treated as annoying gadflies, whose only effect is to distract the hard core of a group. However, they serve in a number of underappreciated roles. In the Austrian case, they help to bridge the gap between the mainstream and the Austrian school. Economists like Leland Yeager, who sympathizes with market process theory, can make a marginalized movement appear more respectable to the mainstream. They can also help bridge gaps and create dialogue between different heterodox movements. For example, Theodore Burczak has recently attempted to synthesize Marx and Hayek, provoking conversation between Marxist and Austrian economists. Most importantly, such people help prevent groupthink and insularity within a school of thought.

1 comment:

  1. The Austrian School and Marxism are closer in many more ways than is commonly thought. I'm broadly a Marxist myself but I see correspondences between Marx's and Hayek's capital and business cycle theories. I've recently become interested in the question of the methodology of the Austrian School from talking to Andy Denis.

    There are major differences of course, but I often feel the Austrian School gets unfairly maligned by socialists. I haven't read Burczak (yet) but there are a few scholars about, notably Chris Sciabarra, who draw on Marx and Hayek.

    It's a pity that most Marxists and Austrianists have such poor understandings of their opponents' theories. Indeed, those on either side would be horrified to realise how much they had in common.

    From reading your blog, it seems like you're coming at all this without a lot of ideological baggage, so I hope you keep it up.

    regards

    Barry Marshall
    mrbarrymarshall - at - gmail - dot - com

    ReplyDelete